IntroductionThe first question that needed to be answered is where universal rights begin. And where does the term women's human rights come from? What does it mean? “The term “women's human rights” has served as a site for praxis, that is, for the development of political strategies shaped by the interaction between analytical insights and concrete political practices.” Since the 1980s and 1990s, women's movements around the world have formed systems and alliances to give greater visibility both to the problems women face on a daily basis and to the centrality of women's experiences in political, social, economic and environmental. law, if you read between the lines you will find someone's story behind it all. Law does not grow on its own, but is driven by social logic and challenge to domination, by forged interaction and resistance to change. Any law or right is not based on women's experiences. Violations of men's human rights fit better into the paradigm of human rights violations because that paradigm is based on men's experiences. Men have their human rights violated: Rather, when someone's human rights are recognized as violated, it is probably a man and because the paradigm was based on the experiences of men. Male reality has become the principle of human rights or at least the principle that governs the practice of human rights. Men have and take liberties as a function of their social power as men. Men have often needed state force to get away with subjugating other men; slavery and segregation in the United States and Hitler's persecutions were explicitly legalized. So the model of human rights violation is based on state action. The result is that men socially use their freedoms to deprive women… at the heart of the paper… recognizes that violence against women violates human rights. Crimes against humanity, which traditionally may be gender-based, were not included in treaty law. In the international crime of genocide, the sex-specific destruction of women as members of their religious, national or ethnic communities is largely ignored. As positions polarized during the Cold War, Western governments prioritized civil and political rights, which they believed were integral to a prosperous free-market economy. Meanwhile, socioeconomic rights to work, housing and health, for example, became identified with the socialist bloc and were therefore suspect to many in the West. Thus, human rights bodies dominated by Western conceptions of human rights priorities have focused on violations within the civil and political sphere, the “public” sphere. Column 3 movement for change