Although many refer to the earth as our “home,” a place that should protect us, we should protect that too. We should return the favor, but instead we thank the Earth because it is home to 7.7 billion people and has almost its carrying capacity. Carrying capacity means that there is a maximum population size that existed before the environment ultimately led to our extinction. The Earth is unable to nourish each of us as it once could. Overpopulation states that our resources such as: water, food, medicine, shelter, land, air, plants and animals will become scarce and humans will cease to exist. And what is the main factor? Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an original essaySimple, our lack of recognition is primary due to our ignorance on the issue and indolence to act. Overpopulation can easily be minimized and eventually eliminated over time, but we are more focused on our materialistic consumption to fuel our insecurity and greed. Many of these concerns and their effects are addressed in the Everything Connects article, "Human Population Effects," which provides descriptive examples of each negative effect. In hopes of making changes and regulating the distressing atmosphere after processing the effects mentioned in the previous articles, the Overpopulation is Solvable podcast hosted by Dave Gardner will cover some solutions to counteract them. Likewise, “Mesmerizing Photographs of China's Crushing Overpopulation” by Verrill Courtney expands on these effects by providing the ultimate solution to control overpopulation. I will discuss, interpret, and analyze all of the above-mentioned sources, as well as further my argument that overpopulation is a very real and serious problem that needs to be addressed urgently. Overpopulation contributes to a number of other problems, by reducing this main problem we are virtually solving many others. What are the effects caused by overpopulation? This is discussed within Everything Connects' “Effects of Human Population” which examines the negative effects of our 7.7 billion people on Earth. These effects include loss of fresh water, species extinction, decreased life expectancy, decreased freedom, depletion of natural resources, increased disease outbreaks, loss of habitat, intensive agriculture , global warming/climate change and high crime rates. According to the World Population Balance Sheet, “two billion people live in poverty, more than the population of the entire planet less than 100 years ago. Today there are more people suffering from poverty and hunger in the world than ever before in history,” proving that there has been enormous population growth to the point we are at now. This is evident using the statistics of “two billion people” and “100 years ago”. Why does the world population use these two statistics? Simple, it's about scaring your readers and raising alarm bells in their heads. These are extremely high numbers compared to what we hear on a daily basis and so we will be amazed when we read them for the first time. This is an effective way to get a reaction from your audience and push them to take action against overpopulation. Not only does he use statistics, but he uses historical context in which he compares the population of the planet less than 100 years ago to the population today. Likewise, this historical context also draws attention to intellectual history because it toofocused on overpopulation or hints at this problem from the past. It also shows that overpopulation is still happening. This shows large growth over time and highlights that the problem has not been solved nor has our population growth been reduced. By highlighting these key concepts, the World Population Balance has gained credibility and demonstrated that the problem is in fact real and serious. Everything Connects is shaped by historical and intellectual contexts because without evaluating the circumstances of the (intellectual) past and comparing them to the (historical) present we are unable to identify that overpopulation is a real problem. Overall, this is a powerful statement that touches on historical and intellectual contexts and essentially leaves readers wanting to solve this recurring and ongoing problem; they feel the need to make a difference that no other generation has made. Due to overpopulation, the majority of the population is unable to satisfy their basic survival needs. Overall the public is in an unhealthy, unstable and disconcerting situation due to this problem. I support this, overpopulation is the main factor behind various other problems affecting us and our planet. The funny thing is that we are adding fuel to the fire, we see the effects of the problem and we feel guilty, so we decide to pretend that it is not a real problem. Ironic, right? Why not instead realize that it is a problem, recognize it and find solutions as China has demonstrated: “China has the largest population in the world, at a shocking 1.3 billion people and growing by the minute . ..in 1980 he launched the one-child policy, which allowed each Chinese family to have only one child. This year politics is over and in just three months the population has increased by 0.46% compared to 2015." China saw that they were heading towards a dangerous area and recognized it. The political context is shown in this quote because of China's policy that limits families from having more than one child. Verrill uses this political context to recognize that this is a solvable problem and, what's worse, one that could be solved by our government. Realizing this, the public is shocked to the point of questioning whether our system of government is as fair as we want it to be. Unfortunately, China did not live up to that commitment, and Business Insider has since informed us that the population has increased again. In this case, China focused on politics to solve the problem mentioned in the article, so the political context helped make the article happen. Without the policy, what China did would not have become mainstream and now that it has been reversed, it is being watched closely to see what happens next, essentially serving as the main focus of the article. Overall, if we continue with this bystander effect that someone else will solve the problem, we will never make progress. Because what happens when we assume that others will find a solution? Well, most likely there are others who take the same for granted and it is a continuous domino effect where no one does anything. China has found a temporary solution, but the solution to overpopulation is to join forces. I agree with the one child limit policy and think it would be more effective and it wouldn't have to be 1 child if the whole world agreed on it. It cannot be one country that faces the problem, it was caused by the world, so it must be solved this way. By finding a solution to overpopulation we will solve a large number of other problems, essentially killing two birds with one stone: becausedon't do it? Fortunately, it is not too late to solve the overpopulation problem and there are many things we can do to solve it. fix it. Dave Gardner, host of the podcast, Overpopulation is Solvable, discusses this issue with David Paxson who states: “Overpopulation is solvable, it is humanely solvable… to stop population growth, not to stop it, but to reduce the total number of human beings on the planet, we actually need to get the average birth rate per family below the average of two,” showing a solution to overpopulation that would easily solve the problem. Notice that the word Paxson makes use of “humanely” which seems so off place, but it is so significant. This word carries a lot of weight because it humanly symbolizes not only how easy it is to solve this problem, but it conveys disapproval. This quote also shows a technological context that suggests that this problem can be solved by us, not with advanced technologies , which means it's not as complex as many think it is - there is a quick and manageable solution. ADD PODCAST TECHNOLOGY Disapproval with the word humanly makes us feel incompetent for not recognizing the problem and trying to fix it since it's a pretty simple solution. We are not only seen as incompetent, but lazy and selfish because we do not care about the harm that comes from our actions. Furthermore, the political context can be observed through the ideology of having an average of two children or less, which China similarly desired. China has implemented the one-child policy, something Paxson has also strongly pointed out to us. This idea of ​​an average birth rate strongly suggests an application that would most likely become a law. The solution Paxson provides revolves heavily around politics because that's the only way we'll be able to ensure the public respects it. This podcast addresses the main problems caused by overpopulation and provides us with the definitive solution. I agree with Paxson's solution although there are many other solutions besides this one. This solution is simple and will show results not only extensively but instantly. Telling citizens to limit the number of children they have is difficult and making it a law would indeed get reactions, but many would consider it immoral. The right to liberty and life mentioned in the Declaration of Independence would be raised to exclude this suggestion and this law. Furthermore, this solution is achievable, but will provide a significant result to overpopulation. Limiting each family is asking a lot. However, it is better to reduce the number of children we have so that they can live on a self-sustaining planet; instead of having a horrible life because their planet is falling apart. By reducing the number of children we have, we will save them in the future from many of the negative effects of overpopulation that we are currently facing. Please note: this is just an example. Get a customized document from our expert writers now. Get a Custom Essay Overpopulation is the most important issue we need to address right now if we want our children and grandchildren to live a good life. This isn't just about us and should be considered selfish if we view it as such. Think of all the other generations that will come and will have to pick up after us. How embarrassing is that?! They will look at our generation and wonder how ignorant we were to have the ability to solve the problem and not just do it because we were lazy. Is this really what you want future generations to think of us? At this rate, there may be no other generation and we will be the ones to suffer the effects of?-2016-3.