Given the global tragedies and massacres that have occurred in today's society, where do you stand on the death penalty? This option is still available in 31 out of 50 states. For more than 50 years no one in the United States has been executed for crimes less than murder. However, as of 2008, the United States Supreme Court has rejected the application of the death penalty for all crimes for which death is not filed. Is the execution of a murderer in itself a murder? Is there a line where a life for a life is accepted as justified? Society has now become morally blind to those who oppose capital punishment. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an original essayI believe that executing a person who commits or threatens the community is necessary, especially when there is no remorse on the part of the condemned themselves. Society has become morally blind and those who oppose capital punishment start with expense, overpopulation, mental health issues and innocence. Over the years, murders and violence have increased in the United States. Most humans are typically afraid of death itself. It becomes an uncomfortable topic when brought up in any conversation. It is a delicate issue when addressing a person who has lost a loved one. If every murderer who killed automatically received the death penalty, would murders decrease? Is this an appropriate scenario in which the saying of an eye for an eye comes into effect? In most countries, the death penalty is still an often practiced option, while in the United States the death penalty differs from state to state. If you are willing to commit a crime despite knowing that the consequences can be severe depending on the charge, and therefore I believe that regardless of race, poverty, or wealth, you should pay the consequences. If you don't care enough to hurt others. Why should society care about the condemned when it comes to the death penalty? In most cases money is an important factor in the path the government or prisoner should take. Capital punishment should be legalized in all states today, capital punishment is the issue in hand that separates the nation. There are many supporters who believe in this “capital punishment”, but there are also many people who oppose it. In my opinion, I believe that capital punishment should be implemented in capital murder. After months of deliberations, the committee concluded; this term is deadly. Some argue that this punishment fits the crime. Others feel strongly that this capital punishment is negligent, cruel and unjust and should be abolished. Capital punishment has existed in the United States since ancient times. It was used to punish criminals by hanging or death by electric shock passing through the body, a method still used today as a method of electrocution. The death penalty can be carried out in five different ways, such as lethal injection, death by electricity, lethal gas, firing squad and hanging. But we now have the death penalty for crimes such as treason, espionage, murder, large-scale drug trafficking, or, in some cases, attempted murder of a witness, juror, or court official. If the death penalty were abolished, there would be no need for executions because people convicted of these crimes would not be executed. But what would happen if these people were released on parole after committing such hate crimes? If you are willing to commit a crime despite knowing that the consequences can be severe dependingof the accusation, and therefore I believe that regardless of race, poverty or wealth, you should pay the consequences. If you don't care enough to hurt others. Why should society care about the condemned when it comes to the death penalty? That's why I firmly believe that the death penalty is necessary for some gruesome crimes. Imposing a law such as the death penalty can benefit the government because it no longer spends money per inmate on food, health care, and other resources necessary for survival in prison for inmates serving life sentences. The death penalty can also be exercised to help reduce the rate of crime committed in any state or country. It can prevent the inmate from committing the same crime after being released on a lesser charge or from committing another crime much worse than the first time, which can affect others around him, who may be nonviolent, and can put people at risk others in society. . The more we can prevent a criminal from committing a crime, the greater the chance that prisons will become overpopulated. According to the Death Penalty Information Center, the average cost of a non-capital punishment case is $740,000. For cases in which prosecutors seek the death penalty, the average case cost is $1.26 million. In addition to court costs, the cost of housing a prisoner on death row averages $90,000 more per year than a prisoner in the general population. Now, based on the information provided to us, if we have two cases without capital punishment costing $740,000 each for an inmate who committed a crime other than rape, kidnapping, or murder; this now brings the government $1,480,000 for just two cases. We currently have thousands of prisoners serving time and every year this figure increases. So, the amount it now costs the government has become billions, but the expenses have become an issue for that case which can cost the state $1.26 million to execute a person for murder, when we have already reached that amount with just two prisoners. service time. When you consider the amount it costs for one person $1.26 million it seems crazy, I would agree, but since when do we put a price on justice for our people? I believe the cost of a death penalty case should be ignored when it comes to a crime taken to the extreme. I have included an image below, which reveals how non-capital prison spending went over budget in 2010. Do you agree that imposing a law like the death penalty could benefit the government by not spending more money on detained in food? , health care and other resources necessary for the survival in prison of prisoners serving a life sentence. The death penalty can also be exercised to help reduce the rate of crime committed in any state or country. It can prevent the inmate from committing the same crime after being released on a lesser charge or from committing another crime much worse than the first time, which can affect others around him, who may be nonviolent, and can put people at risk others in society. . In other words, the number of people sentenced to death is not as excessively high as it was in the early years when capital punishment became an option for prisoners and has declined significantly over the years. The more we can prevent a criminal from committing a crime, the greater the chance that prisons will not become overpopulated. In the United States, more than 2.3 million people are incarcerated in state and federal prisons, local jails, county jails,Indians, juvenile correctional facilities, immigration detention centers, military prisons, and civil commitment centers. Approximately 443,000 people have not been convicted of anything and are awaiting trial. Another 41,000 are detained in immigration centers without conviction. On the other hand, 704,000 prisoners are labeled as violent offenders in state prisons. Capital punishment laws create space for potential rehabilitation without addressing the problems of prison overpopulation. Overpopulation can also become expensive starting from employees, food, benefits, healthcare, supplies and prison programs. When prisons become overpopulated, taxpayer costs increase and can anger the public. Taxpayers who now spend billions of dollars to keep them funded will see a significant increase due to overpopulation. Prisons that become overpopulated can dramatically reduce living space. Crowded prisons sometimes lead to more crimes and deaths in prisons. It becomes more difficult to maintain inmates when it is overpopulated. Crowding itself has been shown to increase the level of violence in jails and prisons, as well as the prevalence of psychiatric collapse and suicide. Of course, advocates for mental health prisons say they will focus on treatment, but the sad reality is that with subsequent treatment budget cuts, most prisoners in mental health prisons will end up locked in cells with little to do except take prescribed medications. medications and attending certain groups. Imagine that you are alone in a cell no larger than 6 x 8 feet; you were forced to be alone or vice versa. You have a lack of privacy because you now share that cell with another inmate and a correctional officer passes by your cell every 2-4 hours to ensure the accuracy and security of a prison. You also have very little, if any, communication with family and friends and have no access to social networks to keep up with society. Do you feel isolated now? My point here is that even if the convict is given life imprisonment, instead of the death penalty, it will drive him mad and create room for mental problems. In other words, inmates start going on this emotional roller coaster with only their thoughts, books to read, limited activities, which they may have no interest in, and maybe even writing to keep themselves occupied during the day. How much of that repetitive cycle can you tackle in a day without starting to become a mess yourself? No price can be put on peace of mind, but not having sufficient access to health services in prisons for those with mental health problems, while being incarcerated can increase risks to the lives of other prisoners, as well as suicide. Some believe that may have been the case for Warren McClesky who was reportedly convicted of killing an Atlanta police officer. Many suspected the case went the way it did because of McCleskey's race. In McCleskey's final statement, he said, "I pray that one day this country, supposedly a civilized society, will abolish this barbaric act" (Lee). I know you are just as concerned as I am if an innocent person will be unethically blamed for a crime they did not commit. Innocence is a form of purity and good people should not be penalized for a crime committed by someone else, I agree. We are only trying to decrease the amount of violence in the United States and punish those who abuse their right to life. “Since 1973, more than 160 people have been released from death row with evidence of their innocence.From 1973 to 1999, an average of three exonerations occurred per year. From 2000 to 2011, there were an average of five exonerations per year.” Therefore, when you look at innocent people we think are being executed for something they didn't do. The justice system works equally hard to save those who are innocent and ensure the courts have enough evidence, so they don't release someone who poses a threat to the community. My argument would be that very few of those executed are found innocent after being convicted. There is no real evidence to prove that anyone executed was innocent. I believe there is a fine line regarding when the death penalty should be implemented. If a serial killer or someone who committed a cruel murder needs to be put to death, then I believe justice must be done. Let me give you a different perspective and say that in this case, instead of the convict receiving the death penalty, the person who committed murder committed the crime is punished with life imprisonment whether it is a crime charge murder, rape or kidnapping. Some individuals are still dangerous even behind bars, meaning they would continue to pose a threat and harm to the rest of society while in prison. For example, Pablo Escobar. While Pablo Escobar was incarcerated, he was still committing crimes in the luxurious prison he had built. When this emerged on July 22, 1992, officials were moved to send him to a more conventional prison. Every person has the right to life; the only just punishment is to take away the right to live from the murderers themselves. The past plays an important role when dealing with the death penalty. People will wonder what it will be used for. If you look at previous cases, it worked very well for people who are no longer here. Men and women were cruel and had no remorse for the victim's well-being. There are two types of extreme people on death row. There is the extreme where they feel nothing. They have no concern or remorse for what they have done to the person or their loved ones. Then there is the other extreme where they were emotionally involved and were very intimate with their victims. These kinds of people deserve to die and we must kill them. The criminal is caught, tried and convicted. It is understood the punishment will be served, but the victim he killed has no role to play in his case. He cannot speak on his behalf because he is no longer with us. The killer deprived his family, friends and loved ones of his presence. Watching it grow and thrive. Their grief began with the murder itself. It probably won't end with the murder being carried out, but it gives the family a sense of relief that the murderer is no longer alive because the victim is no longer alive either. Can we do without the death penalty? I think we can do without homicidal maniacs and rapists who commit cold-blooded murders. The death penalty was designed for a certain percentage of individuals who do not deserve to be part of society or even to continue living. The death penalty is not only inflicted on those who commit aggravated theft or fraud. It's a life for a life. If these people cared about their own lives, they would not take another's. Please note: this is just an example. Get a custom paper from our expert writers now. Get a Custom Essay We live in a country where the word freedom is exploited by their citizens and then we have those who may be citizens or immigrants who value life living in the United States. In other words, we all have a life and are in control of our decisions, ethical or unethical. The death penalty is, 31(1), 124-134.