Topic > The multiracial model in Singapore

Benjamin's article is written on the basis that Singapore runs exclusively on multiracialism. He then examines how multiracialism has become intertwined with Singapore and concludes that there should be a balance when adopting the multiracial model. As Benjamin states, race is a significant section of the identity card and “every permanent resident must by law have the 'race' with which the owner claims to share affinity.” And today it is mandatory to fill in the "Tender" section in specific forms. Race occupies an important place in our identity. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an Original Essay Additionally, language is tied to race. As Benjamin observes, the definition of 'mother tongue' is not what it is, but the mother tongue is a "language that strictly belongs to the 'race' to which one claims to belong, regardless of whether one speaks it." This is particularly relevant to Singapore to this day. 'Bilingualism' refers to the acquisition of two languages ​​in general. However, Singapore has a narrow definition in which it specifically refers to English and one's native language, based on one's race. You are not given the freedom to choose the language. With the multiracial system in place, Benjamin states that to show the peculiarities of each culture, differences must be highlighted, similarities must be attenuated. Demonstration forms must show “their separate but equal status.” For example, there are conscious efforts to ensure there is at least one representative of each race represented and appear in GRC banners for festivals such as Chinese New Year and Christmas. , which will show the "equal" state. Benjamin also explains that "projected fantasies can be presented on stage and recorded in books." In schools, children are taught about differences such as dance, food and customs through citizenship education and Racial Harmony Day. This is also the case with National Day parades, where cultural differences are always played out and highlighted, instead of representing a unique Singapore, where commonalities are shared regardless of race and culture. These projected fantasies are at a superficial level and do not truly reflect the daily lives of Singaporeans. Differences in our culture are often highlighted on a superficial basis. In contradiction to what Benjamin defined as culture, it need not be distinctive, but it seems that Singapore will continue to project these fantasies of different races and cultures. When we adopt multiracialism as part of Singapore's culture, Benjamin says it "puts pressure on Chinese people to become more Chinese" and so on. This suggests that Singaporeans are forced to act in accordance with what is expected of their race. For example, a Chinese person must be able to speak Chinese, otherwise they would be condemned and labeled a “potato,” a term used to refer to Chinese people who are unable to speak or know Chinese well, causing a sense of shame. Malays who do not wear the “tudung” are not “Malay” enough. Every individual is subject to some form of monitoring by others to uphold their “Chineseness,” “Malaysianness,” and others. Individuals who do not strictly adhere to how each respective race should behave could face disapproval from the social group, leaving them in disgrace. Please note: this is just an example. Get a custom paper from our expert writers now. Get a custom essay again, the freedom of choice as an individual is put.