The Victim-Victimizer Relationship Typology is an in-depth analysis of how one can become a victim and the levels of responsibility a victim contributes to the crime committed against them imposed, which was first created by Benjamin Mendelson. There are six levels in this analysis: innocent victim, minor guilt victim, guilty victim, guilty offender, guilty offender, guilty victim, guilty victim, and imaginary victim. Setting aside the imaginary victim, each of the five listed increases the amount of responsibility the victim shares during the crime in chronological order. The imaginary victim is a good example of false reporting as an individual may knowingly pretend to be the victim, which leads to confusion (Sanchez). The other five levels of this typology can be easily identified with an example. The innocent victim is someone who suffered the consequences of the crime committed by another party when he had nothing to do with the impostor, as in the case of mass shootings (Sanchez). The victim with lesser guilt explains an individual who is at risk of knowingly or unknowingly participating in the victimization process as entering a high crime area at night which results in a robbery, which will be an important aspect of the criminal cases on college campuses. The guilty victim, guilty of the crime explains someone who participates in the crime while being a victim of it (Sanchez). The guilty offender, the guilty victim explains the situation as the victim initiated an aggression against the offender and suffered the consequences as a result of the offender's retaliation, such as when an offender attempts a robbery but is opposed by the original victim. At the last level, the guilty victim is someone who instigated the conflict before being killed, as women who experience sexual violence by their spouse take revenge by killing their abusive husband. The main problem with this victim-perpetrator model is that the social relationship between victim and perpetrator is ignored, which makes it difficult to critically analyze each criminal case. When an individual is faced with the consequences of a crime, responsibility may be shared unevenly between the perpetrator and the victim, as if the innocent victim could be treated as a victim of lesser guilt solely because of the evidence situational. This phenomenon often leads to the university administrator blaming the victim, which does not move the conversation forward. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an original essay One of the cases shown in the documentary, "The Hunting Ground," tells of a Harvard student, Kamilah Willingham, and her friend who are sexually assaulted. The two went out to drink at a bar, where a companion repeatedly bought them drinks, and when they returned to their dorm room, both were sexually assaulted while unconscious (influenced by alcohol) (The Hunting Ground, 2015 ). Cases like this will often cause confusion when placed in the victim-perpetrator model as some may view these women as innocent victims because they were simply hanging out with their friends and there was no reason to harm themselves, while others may suggest that they could be classified as victims with minor guilt, when they decided to go drinking during the night allowing someone else to continue offering them a drink, which led to them losing consciousness, leaving them vulnerable to potential harm. To distinguish which level it falls intoIn this case, it may be effective to examine their social relationship in depth to see if the victim has suffered unfair harm. Kamilah and her friend were young adult women, while the male companion was a tall individual who could overpower them with force, especially when the two women were influenced by alcohol. This clearly played an important role in the crime as the lack of strength to take revenge allowed the male individual to take advantage of the situation. Although the situational evidence may suggest that the two women should not have gone to the club, the crime would not have occurred if the partner had actively offered a large amount of alcohol to the two. Andrea Pino of the University of North Carolina was sexually assaulted while being dragged into a nightclub bathroom, her head slammed against the wall (The Hunting Ground, 2015). Likewise, this situation could place her at the level of a victim with less guilt because she was attacked in a nightclub where people consume alcohol and in an environment where some may act out of control and harm others knowingly or unknowingly. However, considering her social status as a young student on the university campus, she may have played a role in being targeted for crime as the criminal (often male) can overpower her with force. These examples often allow administrators to be relieved of responsibility because, in their perspective, they may be participating in victim blaming and shifting responsibility to students who are at risk of being harmed on college campuses. Therefore, simply looking at criminal cases through the lens of Benjamin Mendelson's victim-victimizer model would prevent one from critically evaluating the situation. As can be seen, these simplified levels of victimization (referring to the victim-victimizer relationship) often create confusion on the part of third parties, making the process of trying to resolve the conflict or making an accurate verdict difficult. The situation on the university campus and the countless victimizations of sexual violence on students represent this confusion, as suggested by the film, there are discrepancies of ideas between the student victims and the administration. The extent of the problem is extremely profound as most campus rape cases go unreported, as the film depicted the administration's lack of will to act on this issue which often discouraged victims. The victims who appeared in the documentary expressed concern or anger towards the administration as they shared their experience of the administration failing to assist the students or rather, they indirectly blamed the victims by asking questions such as “How would you act differently if this was a game about football?" ?” and “have you tried to take revenge on the attacker?”. This discrepancy in understanding the situation is evident as sexual violence on campus is treated on a different scale between the administration and the victim. The victim clearly considered himself an innocent victim and, in most cases, rightly so. However, the administration may view this as a lower level victim-perpetrator, as a victim with less guilt, as they may claim that it was the student's choice to enter a club during midnight where an assault could occur . Furthermore, they could apply to other theories such as Von Hentig's typology which presents how certain demographics can be victimized. Following Hentig's typology, victims of campus sexual violence (young women) could/.