In a professional context, the priority always tends to be doing the right thing rather than doing things well. This state of mind can sometimes lead an employee down the wrong path: if you do the right thing, but don't do it well, failure is a very real possibility. Looking at the other end of the spectrum, if you choose to do something right, but it's not the right thing to do, that could also end in failure. In many ways, therefore, ensuring that attention is maintained on both ends of this spectrum will lead to the best outcome. This way of dealing with the situation essentially involves two types of thinking: strategic and tactical. Strategic thinkers tend to be more invested in doing the right things and view situations from a more leadership perspective. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an original essayThe problem with being a purely strategic thinker and therefore doing only the right things, is that these people tend to analyze the scenario but often fail to take the necessary action. For example, a company may be tasked with completing the design of a building for a client, a strategic thinker will approach this task as a leader, and while they have the right resources to use in completing this work, they may not deploy their resources in a way that allows the company to finish the job on time and on budget. Therefore, it is important for strategic thinkers to always maintain a sense of urgency, as lack of action can result in a loss of time and money for the company they work for. Tactical thinkers, on the other hand, believe that doing things well is the correct way to approach situations and tend to view them from a managerial point of view. The problem with being an exclusively tactical thinker is that these people often focus all their energy on completing the task at hand, rather than thinking about the outcome. For example, if a consulting firm is trying to find new clients, a strategic thinker may suggest adopting the cold calling method to find new clients. While this may lead to some potential clients in the future, sometimes this is not an extremely effective method in a practical context – therefore, this method of finding new clients shows that doing things right is not always the most effective thing. Therefore, the action is usually ineffective and sometimes even unnecessary, which could have easily been avoided if they had analyzed the situation before taking action. In conclusion, to be successful in a professional environment, you need both strategic and tactical thinking methods. to implement. Strategic thinkers tend to do the right things but fail to take action where tactical thinkers will do things right but sometimes fail to see the big picture. If you combine both ways of thinking, the employee, and ultimately the company they work for, will be more successful. Works Cited: American Psychological Association. (2021). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (7th ed.). Brewer, M. B. (1999). The psychology of prejudice: love for the ingroup and hate for the outgroup? Journal of Social Issues, 55(3), 429-444.Gottlieb, M. C., & Marcum, J. P. (2019). Naming and identity: A cross-cultural examination of the name letter effect. Social, psychological and personality sciences, 10(3), 398-406. Hepper, E. G., & Sedikides, C. (2018). Self-enhancement and self-protection strategies in response to the name letter effect. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1883.Klink, R.R., & Athanasiou, R. (2006)., 85(2),, 76(3), 537-552.