The issue of gun violence and gun control is something that will not go away easily. The importance of this issue is that not all Americans support strict gun control as a beneficial alternative to controlling violence. It is important to examine the issues and theories about the impact of this problem through the writings and reports of gun control and violence experts. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an Original Essay Gun laws have been a hot topic for centuries. We hear about it mostly when a president runs for office or when a tragic event such as a school shooting or the murder of a police officer has occurred. These incidents include the Sandy Hook massacre, the assassination of President John Kennedy, Martin Luther King Jr, and the Columbine shooting. When these events occur, most people are scared and want to buy more guns to protect themselves or want to prevent people from arming themselves altogether. Regardless, the people of the United States all have the same goal, which is to make America a safer place for everyone. What are the benefits of having strict gun control laws? There was much debate about which route would be most effective. If everyone owned and carried a gun, would public shootings be less common? If no one legally owned a gun, would fewer violent crimes be committed? Or would the weapons be transferred to the illegal black market? Read on and I will provide proven facts about what needs to be done so Americans can be safe again. Do you know the process of buying a gun in the United States? Are weapons easily available? Roanoke Firearms owner John Markell told the New York Times that in Virginia you can buy a semi-automatic pistol "in 15 minutes." Roanoke Firearms is the store where Seung-Hui Cho — who killed 32 people in a shooting on the Virginia Tech campus — purchased a Glock after passing two background checks. It took a Philly Inquirer reporter 7 minutes to purchase an AR-15, the semi-automatic pistol used in many of the deadliest mass shootings in the United States. The Huffington Post reported that, in Orlando, purchasing the AR-15 took just 38 minutes. This came just two days after the shooting that killed 49 people at the Pulse nightclub in Orlando (Taylor & Hanbury, Business Insider, 2018) Creating a mandatory waiting time or “cooling off” period before you can purchase a gun will help to prevent angry and impulsive actions / or mental condition. A study completed by researchers at Northeastern University and Harvard University estimated that 22 percent of gun sales occur without a background check under the current system. This is disconcerting and unacceptable. Under federal law, criminal background checks on dealer sales must be conducted using the FBI's National Instant Criminal Background Check System. (Clair, National Public, 2018) Most states that require background checks on gun sales by unlicensed sellers also use NICS, but some do not. If an FBI background check takes more than three days, the gun sale is approved by default. That's how Dylan Roof, the killer of nine people in a South Carolina church in 2015, managed to buy a gun despite having a police record that included drug possession. Gun laws vary significantly by state.Eight states, including California and Rhode Island, impose waiting periods on the purchase of some or all firearms. But in states with less regulation, like Nevada or Virginia, purchases are quick and easy. That's because the NRA defeated the Brady Act originally proposed in 1987. In 1998, the NRA managed to secure an important admission: the final form of the law stipulated that the five-day waiting period for gun sales would be replaced from an instant computerized background check that had no waiting period. Some states have stricter regulation for certain types of firearms, such as assault rifles or ambush rifles, but in states with less gun regulation, rapid-fire weapons are treated similarly to any other gun purchase. firearms. As Gardiner said, "It's shocking that a 19-year-old can't buy a beer and can't buy a gun, but can buy an AR-15 under federal law." This is crazy and needs to be changed. Controversy continues over which categories of people, such as convicted felons, people with serious or violent mental illnesses, and people on the federal no-fly list, should be barred from purchasing firearms. The federal and state governments are currently struggling to find a balance between public safety and violation of personal rights. In response to public demand, numerous states have taken a categorical approach to gun ownership and the mentally ill. These laws categorically limit firearm ownership and purchasing rights for people with mental illnesses. Some state lawmakers suggest that this measure is actually the least burdensome to gun rights because it creates tougher laws without changing general gun laws as they apply to most people. A number of states have also passed laws for family members concerned about someone going through a mental disorder. health crisis that gives them the ability to report it to local police and possibly temporarily take away someone's firearms. These are known as Red Flag laws. Red Flag laws, also called extreme risk protection order laws, allow a judge to issue an order allowing law enforcement to take away firearms from individuals deemed a risk to themselves or others . After the Parkland shooting, at least two dozen states considered enacting similar laws in their states. Currently, only five states – Connecticut, Washington, Indiana, California and Oregon – have warning laws, most of which were put in place after the tragedy. With a "red flag" law, they could bring evidence before a judge and seek immediate action rather than go through the more difficult process of convicting someone or prosecuting them for a crime. Several states have also strengthened laws related to domestic violence, even in states where you wouldn't expect gun control to pass. Louisiana, for example, is among the states that have passed laws to prevent people convicted of domestic abuse from carrying concealed weapons. But in other states, lawmakers have liberalized gun laws. They have pushed to allow the use of firearms in places where they have long been banned, such as schools and college campuses. Such provisions have become law in Tennessee and Texas, and many say they put students and teachers in danger. People under 25 are responsible for an excessive amount of gun violence in America. According to data collected by the FBI, nearly 50% of all gun homicides are committed bypeople under the age of 25. Most of these authors are between 18 and 24 years old. The perpetrators of mass murder are also often young. What common theme runs through the high-profile mass shootings in Charleston, South Carolina; Aurora, Colorado; and Tucson? All the killers were under the age of 25 and all had purchased the weapons legally. it was a year of a united national effort to regulate these weapons. In all, at least 28 states passed anti-machine gun laws during this period. In Texas law, machine guns are defined as those from which more than five bullets were automatically discharged from a magazine with a single operation of the firing device. After a series of high-profile mass shootings, President Bill Clinton signed the 1994 assault weapons ban, which controlled certain features of semi-automatic pistols, rifles, and shotguns. It expired in 2004, and the chances of it passing Congress again are unknown. The use of an AR-15 rifle in Parkland and Sandy Hook, and other major attacks, continued to prompt new restrictions. Opponents of gun control fear that the criminal who wants a gun may obtain one illegally, and this leaves the average law-abiding citizen helpless and defenseless. Evidently, there is much debate between pro-gun control citizens and pro-gun advocates. Many gun advocates believe that “guns don't kill people, people do.” Or “If they don't use a gun, they will use something else like a hammer, a knife, or a bomb.” As this may be true, a rapid single gunshot can and most likely will result in death while a hammer or knife should be at close range and multiple shots should be attempted. Furthermore, it is more difficult to cause mass casualties with a hammer or a knife. Professional gun owners need to know that the changes that need to be imposed will not conflict with the Second Amendment and their right to protect themselves. We just need stricter laws on how firearms are obtained. Countless citizens believe that all of America's gun problems are based on mental illness. While it may be true that some disorders suggest that people are more prone to violence or aggression, many people who suffer from mental disorders are not dangerous. Studies have actually suggested that people with psychiatric disabilities are much more likely to be victims than perpetrators of violent crimes. Also, for some reason, addiction is not recognized as a disorder that qualifies as a “mental illness,” but people with substance abuse problems are more likely to commit violent acts. Furthermore, there is not enough reliable evidence to suggest that mental health professionals can accurately predict an individual's susceptibility to gun violence without additional methods beyond their traditional approaches. Therefore, mental health professionals are not always accurate in diagnosing patients and are equally limited in their ability to predict future dangerousness. Another often used rebuttal is “the only thing that stops a bad guy with a gun is a good guy with a gun.” gun." While this may be true, it is unfortunately a statistically rare occurrence. Not to mention that if the "bad guy" didn't have access to firearms, "a good guy with a gun" wouldn't be necessary in the first place. Did you know that for every criminal killed in self-defense, there are dozens of other murders? This is another set of statistics that undermines the "good guy with one" theory.