Kolb developed a theory that has been widely used today. In his study, he developed the learning cycle theory which states that we learn from the experience we gather from our daily activities. In this sense, the theory tends to treat reflection as a critical part of such learning. In 1984, David Kolb developed the Learning Style Inventory from his earning style model published at that time. Kolb's theory works on the basis of two separate levels in a cycle consisting of four learning stages and a second level consisting of four separate learning styles. He referred to learning as the process of acquiring abstract concepts that can be applied flexibly in more than one situation. Kobl therefore believes that the learning process is where there is the creation of knowledge through the process of transforming experience. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an Original Essay It has been noted that success always emerges from a group composed of numerous learning styles (Bergsteiner and Avery, p257). It has been proven through research that a homogeneous group composed of any learning style learns less than a heterogeneous group composed of multiple learning styles. Through research, it has also been established that randomly forming a team that includes more than one student has better results than self-selected studies (Bergsteiner and Avery, p257). This helps teachers know that the group is made up of all types of students, which helps in preparing student teaching units that include different teaching strategies (Bergsteiner and Avery, p257). The model however has a number of problems despite its applicability and performance improvement especially in higher education institutions (Murphy, p64). This experimental model is never applicable in all situations. The theory however is involved in providing only some factors involved in the learning process. Furthermore, the model is never applicable to the institutional, social and psychodynamic aspects of learning. The styles involved in this theory are associated with a lack of validity, reliability and objectivity (Kinsella, p277). Its use in limited cultures also makes it associated with generalization which makes it unsuitable for other cultures. Through the use of Kolb's learning cycle, I have had the opportunity to reflect on my work experience. I had the chance to experiment with different coaching styles best suited to any group or individual which helped me to break down barriers with people who have a protected characteristic under the Equality Act 2010 during the disability football session ( McDonald and Boud, p209). I was able to learn that every individual needs a good coach who is able to adapt to all his participants and understand the best coaching style to employ that suits all the people he has to coach. I will be able to plan my future sessions by understanding that sessions that work for a particular group may not be applicable to other groups unless they are modified to accommodate a group or individual. For example, I was able to understand that sessions that work for disabled people may not work on people who don't have disabilities, unless otherwise. If the disabled person in these cases is deaf, a normal person would have difficulty adapting to sessions where only sign language is used. At the end of the sessions the coach helped me clarify the?