The National Sexual Violence Resource Center reported in 2015 that one in five women and one in seventy-one men will be victims of sexual assault in the United States at least once in their lifetime. They further break it down based on sexual orientation, race, and nationality to further demonstrate that the issue of sexual violence is not limited by any of the characteristics mentioned above. Sexual assault is defined as any unwanted sexual advance which can range from cat calling to groping and rape and currently the name of the accused is published to the public while the name of the accuser is kept private to protect their privacy. This begs the question: is this right? Many have argued that to truly protect victims of sexual violence the name of the accused should be published to draw attention to the case and the topic, bring more victims forward and ensure a sense of justice, and to ensure that the issue of sexual violence sexual violence is raised and resolved in every way possible. However, I believe that the name of the accused should remain private until conviction or non-judgment, thus protecting not only the sanctity of the judicial system, the accused against false accusations that could harm not only his career but also his psyche. health and increase sensitivity and respect for victims and the topic in general due to the immediate decrease in evidence that could be used to prevent victims from finding resources and clinics to seek help. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an original essay Particularly in the United States, the justice system is often tainted by social pressures shaped by contemporary media, popular culture, and hidden political agendas. This has led many people to advocate for journalists to take the reins and publish stories to bring attention to the persistent problem of sexual violence and its victims. Usually the media tries to draw attention only to the accused person and the context of his life and not only to the topic of sexual violence and its consequences. While in some cases it could be argued that it is important to look at an individual's past to understand their motivations, in cases of sexual assault in the media, the press does so not to demonstrate motivations or intentions, but instead to gain attention from every outlet possible. This in turn means that, especially in cases involving celebrities, the jury does not have the opportunity to be impartial, thus leading to a biased decision in court. The amount of attention athletes, influencers and other celebrities receive both in person and online means that people have preconceived notions about their lifestyle and morals regarding sexual assault or other inherently violent crimes. Therefore, when the press spreads the name of the accused of sexual crimes, opinions will be immediately provided even without all the facts, as seen daily on social media platforms. The court's decision should be based entirely on the facts associated with the case, and justice should be sought in a manner that ensures not only that the defendant actually committed the crime and was not falsely accused, but that, if convicted, he or she will serve time. adequate time or entail consequences coinciding with the seriousness of the crime. Therefore, the best and only way to ensure that your case is dealt with efficiently and effectively is to ensure that any social pressures or biases are kept as far away from the court as possible. What is the way.