IndexThe Problem of Illegal ImmigrationBorder WallWorks Cited The Problem of Illegal ImmigrationIntroduction: Every day, thousands of illegal immigrants from Mexico enter the United States, taking advantage of our jobs, our industries and our money. This will continue to happen until we act. For centuries now, America has prided itself on being a community open to all, providing strength to the weak and hope to the desperate. While the idea of ​​being open to all is important in our society, illegal immigration is becoming more and more of a problem, rapidly destroying our economy and pushing our country further into debt, while also harming our society as a whole . Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an original essayBorder WallContext: Coming into force as early as the 1960s, the project to build a wall along the U.S.-Mexico border began quickly and effectively neutralized the dangers of illegal immigration, but this wall was not and it is not always supported. Some may say that the wall spreads a racist message and causes damage to our economy due to the ever-increasing costs of maintaining such a project, but contrary to these views, the wall has proven effective in reducing illegal immigration with the highest costs tall. -benefit ratio. Thesis Statement: Since a wall has proven to be the most effective method of protection, combined with the fact that so many people immigrate to the United States illegally, illegally exploiting our resources and destroying our economy, it is imperative to build a wall between our two nations in order to protect our nation from threats posed against our lawful citizens. Topic sentence: Some may not support a wall for two main reasons, such as that the wall will be too expensive to finance, and that it is a racist statement broadcast to the entire world. Convinced that a wall will not solve any problems, wall opponents look for points to prove the truth of their opinions. As Peter Schrag, a California political and political history journalist, says in his article on the wall's effectiveness in stopping illegal immigration: “More than 670 miles of border fences, walls, Introduction: Every day, thousands of illegal immigrants from Mexico enters the United States, taking advantage of our jobs, our industries and our money. This will continue to happen until we act. For centuries now, America has prided itself on being a community open to all, providing strength to the weak and hope to the desperate. While the idea of ​​being open to all is important in our society, illegal immigration is becoming more and more of a problem, rapidly destroying our economy and pushing our country further into debt, while at the same time harming our society in the its whole. Context: The project to build a wall along the border between the United States and Mexico began in the 1960s, quickly and effectively neutralizing the dangers of illegal immigration, but this wall was not and is not always supported . Some may say that the wall spreads a racist message and causes damage to our economy due to the ever-increasing costs of maintaining such a project, but contrary to these views, the wall has proven effective in reducing illegal immigration with the highest costs tall. benefit ratio. Thesis Statement: Since a wall has proven to be the most effective method of protection, combined with the fact that so many peopleillegally immigrate to the United States, illegally exploiting our resources and destroying our economy, it is imperative to build a wall between our two nations in order to protect our nation from threats posed against our legal citizens. Topic sentence: Some may not support a wall for two main reasons, such as that the wall will be too expensive after all, and that it is a racist statement made to the world. Convinced that a wall will not solve any problems, wall opponents look for points to prove the truth of their opinions. Evidence and citations: As Peter Schrag, a California political and political history journalist, says in his article on the wall's effectiveness in stopping illegal immigration, "More than 670 miles of border fences, walls, bollards and spikes that the Congress enacted in 2006 at an estimated cost of $4 billion (plus future maintenance) are nearly complete. The Border Patrol, which was increased from 9,000 agents in 2001 to 20,000 in 2009, costs about $4 billion all. 'year” (Schrag). Comment: As he says, the wall costs money, and a lot of it. It will not be possible to maintain it, and this is one of the major points against building a wall. Even if this represents a problem, because money is and will always be a concern, opponents of the wall do not seem to understand that we can easily afford such an undertaking Evidence and Citations: The Argument Concerning the High Costs of Financing a Wall The wall can easily be disproved by the simple fact that the budget. for the year 2019 alone exceeds four trillion dollars, which, compared to the possible twenty billion dollars, completely eradicates the idea that a wall is too expensive. Topic sentence: Like one of the other points made on the Democratic side of the argument, the idea of ​​a wall is fundamentally racist. Evidence and quotes: Mark Karlin, a political researcher and journalist who has found flaws in the arguments presented by opposing sides, presents his point of view on the real reasons for building the wall: “The origins of the billions of dollars spent on the wall, in largely symbolic and highly visible, actually begin much further north, with U.S. organizations and people advocating a white political power structure, groups like one recently represented at the Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC), arguing that a multicultural society is a danger to America” (Karlin). He is stating how a wall will directly shut down our cultural growth and will not actually solve the root problems, being a symbol of white supremacy rather than a real solution. He argues that a wall is racist and will only prove to be a negative drain on our workforce and our people. Comment: This idea that a wall is racist is inherently false and the statements provided are stretching the truth a bit. Evidence and quote: The wall is not meant to be against Latino and Hispanic populations, the wall is only there to protect American citizens from the danger of illegal immigration, with no ulterior racist agenda. It happens to be on the southwestern border, and since this ends up affecting the population of non-white people who immigrated illegally from Mexico, opponents of the wall will seize on this fact and claim that it is racist, in order to further their own point of view. Even though a wall may cost money, or be considered racist, these points are by no means sufficient to discourage the construction of a wall, as the reasons behind these arguments are based on pseudo-claims and invalid evidence. Topic sentence: A wall has proven time and time again to be a viable solution to restoring security along our border, and theCrime rates and illegal activities have decreased wherever a wall has been erected. Evidence and Citations: Through statistics provided by the Department of Homeland Security, one can argue that a wall is actually quite effective, as “[p]atrols in the Southwest have substantially increased the amount of drugs, guns, and cash seized in the last three years: 74% more money, 41% more drugs and 159% more weapons were seized. Additionally, since 2008, crime rates have decreased in Arizona, California, New Mexico, and Texas” (Department of Homeland Security). As further studies show, with supporting data, walls have proven to be the most effective long-term solution.term solution, and the numbers only further that point. More illegally imported money, drugs and weapons were confiscated with the wall, which only shows the effectiveness of the wall. However, without a wall, more and more immigrants and people are entering illegally every day, and the fact that we decide not to act certainly doesn't help the situation. Evidence and Citations: As further evidence of the walls' functionality, Alex K Rich and Heather Newton, both professors with degrees in law and ethics, cite the Border Patrol to say that "[t]he evidence that border walls are effective deterrents against illegal entry is demonstrated by the fact that cities equipped with walls or similar barriers have seen a dramatic drop in the number of illegal immigrants crossing those points. Border Patrol agents in Naco, Arizona, for example, have reported that the wall built there in 1996 cut illegal immigration in half in one year” (Rich and Newton 2). few solutions with concrete results.As mentioned, when the current wall was built, its length suffered a massive halving of the number of illegal immigrants.The fact that the wall made such massive changes in such a short time proves that a wall is a necessary and practical solution. Evidence and Citations: Westley Parker, researcher and reporter, states that “despite these shortcomings, the number of illegal aliens apprehended by U.S. Border Patrol has declined dramatically as the length of the Southwest Barrier has increased—evidence that even a limited barrier can deter illegal immigration” (Parker).Topic sentence: Even though the wall was not fully completed, even the finished wall did wonders in terms of protecting our U.S. citizens from illegal immigration. With a wall, you also stop people from trying to immigrate illegally as it has become much more dangerous and difficult. Evidence and Citations: Even though people try to cross it, the wall is designed with the idea of ​​security checkpoints where people are arrested and captured if they participate in illegal activities. Overall, a wall has proven effective, and the reasons to build it far outweigh the reasons not to. Simply put, we cannot support the unlimited flow of immigrants, and as time passes, it is obvious that we need more security. along our borders to protect our nation. Evidence and Citations: As Alex Rich and Heather Newton state, "As long as the border is porous, the Mexican government will have no incentive to create more jobs in Mexico, since anyone who wants a job can simply cross the border into the States United" (Rich and Newton 2). Due to the porous border being a problem, our underlying problem with Mexico is revealed, as without any reason to change, the Mexican economy will collapse and we will suffer the consequences. Mostwill agree that Mexico is going through difficult times, but since we do nothing and do not at least try to stop the flow, Mexico will not do anything either. We will continue to have illegal immigrants arriving looking for work and nothing will change. This leads to the main fact that, while a few immigrants may not be a nuisance, a collection of thousands of immigrants every day can cause real problems for our economy. Topic Sentence: Completely dispel the idea that a wall would cost too much by providing Another shocking statistic, the Federation for American Immigration Reform states that “the federal, state, and local costs of more than 12.5 million people illegally present in the United States they amounted to approximately $135 billion per year. Evidence and Citations: After taking into account the tax contributions of this population, the group said that the total economic impact of illegal immigration was approximately $116 billion per year (up from $113 billion in 2013 )” (O'Brien and Raley). Comment: One of the main reasons people oppose the wall is cost and the cost of a wall would be just $20 billion, or just 18% of the $113 billion annual cost to support immigration clandestine. Illegal immigration is, in fact, illegal, and the fact that people still oppose the wall, the crazy benefits that come with it are unreal. This wall-building maneuver would save so much money that it would blow all the other numbers out of the water. A wall would save money, protect us from illegal immigration, and generally send a message to other countries that we are strong and that we will not give up if we feel threatened. Please note: this is just an example. Get a custom paper from our expert writers now. Get a Custom Essay Concluding Paragraph: As a necessary precaution to protect our nation, it is necessary to build a wall to reduce the amount of illegal immigrants from our border with Mexico. It would be economically beneficial and would greatly reduce the amount of illegal immigration. Even if the opposition claimed that a wall would send racist signals and cost too much, it would simply be a statement that we are not afraid to back down and that we are ready to fight for our rights as Americans. It is our responsibility to protect our country and the best way to achieve this is to simply build a wall. There are too many reasons why we cannot simply ignore our problems with Mexico and must take action to reform our systems or set up defenses. Works Cited “US Southern Border Fence Reflects American Racism.” Should the United States Close Its Borders?, edited by Louise Gerdes, Greenhaven Press, 2014. In question. Opposing Views in Context, https://link.galegroup.com/apps/doc/EJ3010615232/OVIC?u=powa9245&sid=OVIC&xid=3aa62ced.O'Brien, Matt and Spencer Raley. “The Fiscal Burden of Illegal Immigration on US Taxpayers | Federation for American Immigration Reform.” Federation for American Immigration Reform, 27 September 2017, fairus.org/issue/publications-resources/fiscal-burden-illegal-immigration-united-states-taxpayers.Parker, Westley. “Work on border walls.” American Renaissance, September 28, 2018, www.amren.com/features/2018/02/border-walls-work/.Rich, Alex K., and Heather Newton. “Point: A wall is the best way to protect the U.S. border.” Points of View: Border Walls, March 31, 2017, p. 2. EBSCOhost, search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=pwh&AN=28675183&site=pov-live.Schrag, Peter. “Strengthening the border between the United States and Mexico does not.