Topic > Sermon on the Mount Analysis and Reflection

In the King James Version of the Holy Bible, Jesus Christ delivers a sermon, or set of commands and expectations, called The Sermon on the Mount. I will deeply and imperfectly analyze the words of Jesus Christ, even though I am completely incapable of doing so. As a modern believer of the ancient teachings of Christ, I declare that his words are perfect in concept, theory and delivery. My effort to analyze them will therefore irrefutably fall short of this belief. It will be interesting, however, to consider his instructions in this new way. Jesus, of course, is the original author of the Sermon on the Mount contained in the Book of Matthew in the Holy Bible, and this particular set of teachings took place in 30 AD. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an original essay Jesus came from a town called Nazareth in a rural area of ​​Galilee. As far as our course work is concerned, during that time period, Galilee was surrounded by a number of Greek city-states and was ruled by Antipo. Jesus was heralded by some as a great teacher and by others as a serious threat. Despite his antagonists, he preached with perfect love and without fear of repercussions. While teaching anyone who would listen, Jesus gathered a lot of curiosity and crowds in Galilee. The people were interested because of his miraculous healings, and the believers, or disciples, followed him, walking we presume, up a nearby mountain. In his sermon, Jesus encourages both followers and non-followers to live a higher law than the current one. life. To the believers He delivered then and now, this sermon has impeccable credibility because He lived the sermon perfectly: Only He could give this call to action with perfect integrity. His case was, and remains, compelling. In the Greek city-states of that time period there were many acts of a physical nature, but Jesus taught that even acts of the heart have a consequence. This sermon could tell a researcher that teachers in 30 AD used parables and symbols to be effective. In this way, Jesus used the imagery of salt, light, candle, and even eye symbols to effect. In this way, Jesus used images of salt, light, a candle, and even the eye and hand to represent certain warnings. Jesus, as the speaker of this longest sermon in the Holy Bible, displayed a certain bias in his speech – a bias of total optimism and encouragement. This was unique to some of the cruel leaders of the time. Upon reflection, one detail that is missing is whether any questions were asked or any discussion took place during the sermon. There is no reference in the sermon to the reader or researcher to understand if there was any kind of back and forth between teacher and audience. There is also no mention of hecklers or protesters who may have followed him up the mountain to do harm. In contemplation, this concept is very likely considering that he would later be put to death by the Romans. Now I wonder if there were any dissenters among the listeners, a thought that had never occurred to me before, or rather if this was a service made entirely of peace and tranquility, perfect love and encouragement. Please note: this is just a sample. Get a custom article from our expert writers now. Get a Custom Essay I find great comfort in reading and rereading Christ's Sermon on the Mount. His concepts are expressed in a calm and peaceful manner, rather than the harsh manner we learn from so many leaders of his era. His words were not harsh or judgmental,.