IndexArguments in favor of euthanasiaArguments against euthanasiaConclusionReference:Euthanasia, the practice of ending the life of a suffering patient through the use of barbiturates or paralytic injections, remains a highly controversial medical procedure. Although it is legal in most European Union countries, Colombia and several American states, the countries where euthanasia is permitted are still in the minority. This essay will delve into the ethical arguments both for and against euthanasia. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an original essayArguments in favor of euthanasiaOne of the key arguments in favor of euthanasia is that it allows people with incurable diseases to die with dignity, free from unbearable pain. Unlike animals, which can be euthanized by veterinarians when they cannot be cured, humans are often left to endure immense suffering that cannot be relieved by painkillers. Euthanasia offers a peaceful death, allowing patients to be surrounded by their loved ones during their final moments. From a humane perspective, euthanasia provides an escape from the suffering that would otherwise drive patients to consider suicide. Furthermore, the concept of euthanasia highlights the importance of patient autonomy. Individuals have the right to make decisions about their lives, such as whether to receive a coronavirus vaccine or follow prescribed medications and treatments. In these situations, people can manage their health independently. However, when it comes to choosing when and how to end their life, this autonomy is often taken away, forcing them to suffer until they die. This discrepancy raises a contradiction, as individuals are allowed to choose suicide, which is not illegal, but are denied the choice of euthanasia, which involves a similar decision to end one's life. Arguments against euthanasia On the other hand, opponents of euthanasia argue that this medical procedure devalues ​​human life. Parmar et al. (2016) conducted a study revealing that opponents believe individuals should be kept alive regardless of age, illness, disability, or personal preference. Interestingly, these opponents use the same argument as mercy killing for animals in support of euthanasia. They equate the lives of conscious humans with that of domestic animals, reducing the value of human life. Furthermore, opponents argue that legalizing euthanasia could lead to a decrease in the quality of care provided to terminally ill patients, as it is often cheaper to end a person's life than to provide adequate palliative care. There is also concern that some doctors may exploit euthanasia to manipulate patients and their families. Please note: this is just an example. Get a custom paper from our expert writers now. Get a Custom Essay Conclusion In conclusion, the debate over euthanasia remains unresolved due to the equally persuasive arguments for and against it. However, the fact that most countries ban euthanasia indicates that society as a whole is not yet ready to accept euthanasia. However, the ban on euthanasia has given rise to a phenomenon known as “suicide tourism” in countries where euthanasia is legal. This suggests that discussions about euthanasia continue to be relevant, as arguments against it often come from individuals who do not experience, 20(12), 21-30.