Topic > The Great Wall of Family Planning: China's One-Child Policy

When you delve into China's recent history and look at it in today's context, it is impossible to ignore the effects of one of the most elaborate and widespread social experiments of all the time. Following the economic stagnation of the Cultural Revolution and painful memories of famine, China formally introduced a policy in 1978 under which all couples were limited to having one child, coined the “one-child policy.” Deng Xiaoping, China's leader from 1978 to 1989, stated that if the birth rate did not decline rapidly, "we will not be able to develop our economy and raise the living standards of our people." China was home to a quarter of the world's population, all concentrated in just 7% of the world's arable land. To reach the goal of 1.2 billion inhabitants by 2000, universal access to contraception and sterilization was necessary. In 1983 alone, China sterilized more than 20 million people with brutal efficiency. As a result, China today has a fertility rate below the necessary replacement level: 1.6 children per woman. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an original essay The implementation of the one-child policy has had marked effects on gender imbalance and upended traditional frameworks, causing distress and distress for those affected. Although a change was needed in Chinese society, the authorities caused far more sacrifices than gains in enforcing a process that would have occurred naturally. The implications of this policy have spread far and wide, creating a significant gender imbalance, causing reproductive health issues and changing the situation. demographics of the country. The implementation of the policy has spread across China, affecting couples in cities much more than rural families. In 2015, the number of men in China exceeded that of women by 33 million. Culturally, women were and sometimes still are seen as inferior to men, primarily due to traditional ideas about income, ability, and physical strength. Importance was given to having a son; sexually selective abortions, infanticide, and less effective medical care for girls have made this possible. Due to the total imbalance between men and women today, society has witnessed an increase in crime, socially destructive behavior, mental health problems and general dissatisfaction. Many men have difficulty finding partners and are therefore unable to build families, which is central to Chinese culture. Kidnapping, sex and marriage trafficking, and an increase in commercial sex work are also on the rise. This, in turn, has increased the number of cases of sexually transmitted diseases and other related health problems. Furthermore, the policy has posed challenges to women's reproductive and maternal health. Women who carried an unapproved pregnancy often avoided seeking medical attention, for fear of being punished, heavily fined or forced to have an abortion. It was found that in rural Sichuan province in 1990, pregnant mothers who illegally carried a baby were twice as likely to suffer maternal death as those with government-approved pregnancies. The consequences of illegally giving birth without a birth permit ranged from relatively mild to severe, but mostly affected those who were not wealthy. Fines of between five and ten times the family's annual disposable income are typically imposed. If this sum cannot be paid, personal effects such as televisions, tables,bicycles and washing machines could be confiscated from the house. In very rare cases, family members or relatives of a couple have been arrested. Children born to a couple without a birth permit were denied identity, social rights and education. This shows that the policy has indirectly stripped many of their rights to universal healthcare. Furthermore, the policy has upended traditional social frameworks in which younger adults care for older relatives. This is considered an important custom inChinese culture, emphasizing respect and gratitude towards elders. While this tradition is still alive, it is estimated that by 2050, a quarter of China's population will be 65 or older, creating an imbalance between those who can and want to care for the elderly population. This could create problems such as exceeding available professional resources or capacity within the healthcare system for older adults. It could also create tension for many younger individuals or discontent for older people. Some also argue that the policy has created a generation full of single children, producing antisocial, attention-seeking individuals. While this may be true in certain circumstances, the disparity between an only child and one with siblings could be due to other factors, such as education, family relationships, values, and so on. There are too many influences to consider for this to be considered absolutely true. Overall, although the policy seemed compelling at the time of its implementation, it has created extensive problems for the many generations affected by it. Despite the ambitious goals of China's stringent policy, many critics have argued that China overreacted with a solution that ultimately did not produce many positive concrete results. Before this policy, the government had already started campaigns encouraging “more childbearing, more space between children and fewer children”. Between 1970 and 1979, this had already proven quite effective, dramatically decreasing the fertility rate from 5.9 to 2.9. Today the government claims that this policy alone has prevented 400 million births. This claim was widely criticized, as it was based on the false assumption that the fertility rate in China would remain the same over a given period of time. This has been disproved in other countries, as fertility rates generally decline as wealth and education increase. For example, the policy has never been implemented in Hong Kong, where the natural fertility rate has fallen to just under one child per woman. Considering that this sharp decline in fertility had already begun to occur in the 1970s, it is possible that wealth and education had a greater effect on fertility rates in China than politics itself. Another aspect that undermined the effects of the one-child policy was a new marriage law implemented by the government in 1980, which lowered the legal age of marriage to 22 for men and 20 for women. This was put in place to reduce illegal marriages and related crimes, but, of course, encouraged the formation of families and, therefore, children. Furthermore, since families could have more children by paying the fines, the increase in wealth in the country would have made the policy difficult to enforce. By lowering the barrier of economic disincentives and freedom of movement, many families are likely to have avoided punishment or being noticed by authorities. This would also have an effect on the declared number of prevented births. Therefore, the drastic one-child policy is considered ineffective by many, as it has not produced many tangible results today. It is clear that.