My main concern is not the right-wing parties themselves, but how they have become the cause of the growth of these political parties across Europe and how where the European Union helped this increase. The causes can be determined in terms of economic stability but also of security for the population and for the borders of the State. The rise of the far right remains important today due to the lack of a total resolution, or at least the lack of positive results from these resolutions. In this essay, a brief history of the far right will be explained to better understand the reasons behind the ideology of these far right parties, as well as the economic and security aspects, two of the main arguments in favor of these parties will also be discussed. . Then I will analyze some EU resolutions and the rise of the far right in some EU member states. Finally, the essay will conclude by asking whether or not the actions taken by the European Union have helped the rise of the far right, and how this happened. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an original essay From World War II to the 1980s, the far right was essentially irrelevant to the political field in Europe. It was mostly linked to fascist ideology, known for its use of violence and inclination towards pre-war ideologies, which were therefore heavily criticized. But after the 1980s the far right seemed to resurrect and gain popularity. It is important to remember that this far right has nothing to do with the fascist ideology of the past and seeks to bring something new and different to the table. This “new” right wing focuses primarily on business and the capitalist economy. In its characteristics we can find a conservative thought that tends to maintain the established social order and supports tradition, authority but, above all, nationalism. It is important to remember that with this line of thinking we can understand why far-right parties oppose supranational institutions such as the European Union; “These forces have too much control over national governments.” The European Union was created to maintain a strong unity among its members, in order to prevent another global tragedy like World War II and to create a strong leading economic bloc. To do this, it is quite clear that each member of the EU abdicates certain national decisions, accepting the rules established by the EU in order to create a single body. But at the same time, each country's nationalism has pushed societies against not only migrants but also against the EU as an institution. Taking into consideration what was mentioned above, we can connect the immigration crisis that began in 2015 with the rise of far-right political parties. Right-wing populists have risen due to many different factors such as immigration, the euro crisis and terrorist attacks in countries like France and Brussels, but I can argue that the migrant crisis is the origin of everything mentioned before . This can be argued because of all the implications the migration crisis has with each state and how some EU policies have been changed in such a way as to put some states in very difficult positions. This will be carefully explained later in the essay. I will now focus on the changes in the economic sector following the immigrant crisis. The migration crisis in Europe has had a huge impact on the economies of EU members. According to Rakesh Sharma, a highly reputed journalist, there are three main impacts. First, the increase in spending in the social sector increases accordinglyof migrants' arrival in countries, because host countries often need to spend their own money to help migrants and provide them with housing and education, until the refugees become an active taxpayer. the local economy, working. As a result, nations have to spend extra “socially earmarked” money, instead of allocating it to their own citizens. Second, refugees tend to alter the local labor market. This can increase the unemployment rate due to the displacement of local workers. The competitiveness to take up a job now is not only among local citizens but also against skilled labor from other countries. And last but not least, the increase in aggregate demand. Sharma establishes that “new migrants represent potential markets for new services” (2015), which is a good thing. With this in mind, we might ask: why do these impacts contribute to feelings of xenophobia? It can be said that the poorest populations of Europe soon realized that the increase in budgetary expenditure on social benefits mainly affected refugees and only them. “They enjoyed privileged access to benefits and financial support, while they themselves (local citizens) were losing it.” The EU Action Plan on the Integration of Third-Country Nationals (2016) established that all EU members collaborate more on integration, as well as providing the services necessary to do so. But taking this into account, the 2008 global economic crisis that the EU struggled to manage, found itself taking high-risk actions to try to prevent another one. Economic instability across the continent has forced the EU to “cut spending in almost all areas of people's daily lives”; it was the right decision. But we can see this in conflict with recent decisions to provide for asylum seekers. For more recent decisions we refer to the incentive given to EU members to devote their efforts and resources to helping refugees. These “responsibilities” include education, asylum paperwork, housing, medical care, paperwork, and more. Seeing two totally different reactions to two different problems facing society helped strengthen the far right's position. “This is seen as a problem/foundation by these far-right parties because in that case the focus of the European Union would be the well-being of the European Union rather than the well-being of individual states.”On the other hand, one sees the problematic urgency of security in Europe. Lehne, an expert on relations between the EU and its members, said public concern about refugees deepened as Islamic terrorism and ever-increasing crime rates began to increase in their countries. countries and have created a bond associated with mass inflows of migrants. It is of great importance, as he stresses, to keep in mind that these acts of terrorism were perpetrated by Europeans, not refugees. However, the media has not contributed in any way to this situation because they mainly focus on incidents related to asylum seekers, causing society to consider them as one and the same. We can understand here why the sense of insecurity has increased across Europe. Furthermore, the EU has strengthened the Dublin Regulation for all its members. It establishes that the country of entry (for refugees) must be responsible for managing the asylum request. We can see that due to the geographical position some countries are burdened beyond measure, for example Italy and Greece. However, it has happened that these countries have “neglected” their responsibilities and haveallowed refugees to move deeper into the continent to seek asylum. The European Commission, aware of the problem, has decided to modify the Dublin Regulation. While maintaining the original responsibilities attributed to the country of first entry, if that state welcomed a considerable number of refugees, a "corrective allocation mechanism" would trigger the transfer of migrants to a less burdened state". Now we can see how the refugee crisis has put a lot of pressure on the national borders of some EU countries. Many EU members believe that the European Union may need to focus on a more intensive action plan for refugees entering the EU. Others decided that the EU “should not take in any refugees as this would only cause problems and undermine the security of the European Union”. While they are primarily concerned with “prioritizing humanitarian concerns and allowing hundreds of thousands of refugees to cross their borders,” others are not “particularly enthusiastic about welcoming refugees fleeing war and poverty into Syria.” At this point, a strong wave of both Islamophobia and xenophobia spread across Central European countries. To fully understand how these economic and security factors impact the European Union, the policies of the European Union have indeed strengthened the presence of far-right parties in politics concerning issues of concern in Europe. For example Hungary. Back in 2015, Hungary planned to build a four-meter-high wall to protect its borders. The wall was allegedly built with Serbia in an attempt to prevent refugees from crossing it. Viktor Orbán, Prime Minister, openly accuses the previously mentioned EU plan to resettle asylum seekers and refugees in member states as “crazy”. From then on he made his administration and subsequent campaigns increasingly open to his nationalistic ideals. Just last April he secured his third term. His main speech topic: immigration. Immediately after the victory he declared that it had given fellow Hungarians "the opportunity to defend themselves and to defend Hungary". Not only has he been called racist, but he is also considered the representative of the Visegrad group which “opposes the EU's plans to force countries to accept migrants under a quota system”. Hungary has a history of slowly growing far-right ideology over the years, especially since the fall of the Soviet Union. The spread of the idea that immigrants steal jobs and put citizens' safety at risk, as well as growing disagreement with EU policies have contributed to the rapid popularity of the Orbán administration. It got to the point where Hungary held a referendum against the relocation resolution. The same happened with the rest of the political systems of the Visegrad group. Former Prime Minister Janez Jansa (de whence) has stated on several occasions that he wants Slovenia "to become a country that puts the well-being and safety of Slovenians first." It got to the point that during his election campaign he formed a tactical alliance with Viktor Orbán against migrants, “borrowing his tactic of stirring up fears towards migrants”. Xenophobic sentiment continues to grow as a result of the political campaigns and propaganda of these far-right parties across Europe, but the reality is that EU resolutions, in some ways, have pushed them to this. The same applies to Slovakia and the Czech Republic. The European Commission is pushing the Czech Republic to accept a certain number of refugees as part of the resettlement, but this has been denied. Both in Slovakia.