Few trials have been as polarizing as the Jodi Arias murder trial. There are several established factors to determine the appropriate punishment in a case like this, but does this trial meet all the criteria? There is a lot of evidence to look at in regards to the Jodi Arias trial and much of it is very compelling, but people understand the difference between a woman guilty of murder and a woman who is legally eligible for the death penalty. Many people do not recognize the boundaries between legal and personal beliefs when it comes to murder trials. People tend to have a preconceived idea of ​​the crime committed and their own ideas about the death penalty, but not many people take into account the specifics that must be met to enforce a law. So the question now remains; Did Jodi Arias commit a death penalty murder? More importantly, should Jodi Arias receive the death penalty based on these criteria? Jodi Arias should be sentenced to death because she was convicted of murder and also because the murder meets all criteria established by the state of Arizona regarding the eligibility of the death penalty. The Jodi Arias trial has captured American attention very quickly and will soon become almost the only thing on television news networks. The trial nearly monopolized Fox News for several months. There are several murders that happen every day in the United States, so how did this murder case attract so much attention? Because it contains many themes that appeal to the American population. According to CNN.com's Elliott McLaughlin, "It's full of sex, lies and digital images, many of them nasty, and the dueling lawyers are lively - nay, bombastic - in their arguments... middle of paper ..... .differently depending on what their personal biases and prejudices are. It goes to show that just because the jury failed to sentence her to the death penalty, doesn't mean she is undeserving. Jodi Arias' trial has been incredibly sensationalized by media. It has been on every major news network and will no doubt be again when sentencing begins again. All the evidence was put on the table and was taken into account when the verdict was reached death because she met all the necessary criteria to have deserved punishment under the law of the state of Arizona She killed Travis Alexander in a manner that could reasonably be believed to be cruel She was convicted of murder and the facts of the murder are no longer in discussion. He committed the crime without thinking about the victim's suffering.