However, he would still likely be held liable for damages for revocation after partial performance, and so we advise him to pay the damages Celine is seeking from him. This would still leave Celine satisfied since it does not demand that the contract be performed and that it receive the work offered, but instead claims the lost costs. ReconsiderationCeline would likely argue that the offer would satisfy the requirement or corresponding benefit/disadvantage, as the disadvantage was moving to Melbourne, and this would be an advantage for the promisor, as it would enable Jonas to set up the childcare center . . This would be a quid pro quo, as the disadvantage of moving to Melbourne would give Celine the advantage of having the job, thus satisfying the contractual requirement. Jonas will hardly discuss this element.Re