The ethics of science has always been that of the search for truth. Ptolemy wanted to know what was in the heavens. Newton wanted to know about motion and force. Einstein wanted to know more about protons and relativity. These scientists and many others have always had a pure desire to know the truth about what interested them. However, if we were to examine the present, scientists today are struggling not because of their journeys in search of the truth, but because of the need to produce results so that they can still have the opportunity to keep their jobs by researching the topics for which they are researching. in recent years. In today's lab, we see researchers scrounging around for funding and screaming on the phone at editors for space in the journal. It is emphasized that professors want to take control of the department's curricula as they will be the building blocks of science for students. Do social organizations, universities and other scientific communities influence science to the point of changing the reality of what science is? I believe that skeptical sociologists of science are wrong to argue that Scientific Reality is nothing more than a monopoly that controls every aspect of science. In this article I will carefully explain what the sociology of science is and its effects on scientists and science, clarify how the above struggle is really affecting scientists and science, and come to a conclusion that will summarize my thoughts on the matter. sociology of science? Robert K. Merton, a famous sociology professor at Columbia University, found interest in the topic of how social and cultural aspects within the laboratory influence the scientific data produced. After observation… half of the paper… given to those who are known to produce results. Sponsors search for potential researchers through journals looking for expertise, so recognition comes from the papers produced by the labs. People fight for space in magazines because it means their names will be made public. The professorship is granted to well-known researchers and professors who seek to take possession of the curriculum to position their thoughts as constitutive elements of the University's students. Ultimately, all of these actions are acts of survival in the harsh environment that science has become. Scientists want to maintain their pure desire to want to know more, even if it means half-doubting their colleagues. Science has sociological factors that influence it, but its evolution is trying to get rid of such factors to reach the “truth”. Therefore, science is still a quest to find the truth.